On 1 July 2015 at 13:23, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jan, > > Could you please elaborate on your statements? Do you disagree that a > Trafodion talk fits with Apache BD? And that you rather have it in > ApacheCon, as you expect that so many other talks in that stream will get > rejected so that the Trafodion talk will get accepted? I am getting > confused here... > I worded it carefully, because this is not my decision, that is a decision the project must make. I was merely stating the differences. We (being the reviewers) should be very careful not to have real opinions where a talk belongs. We review the talk where it is submitted. That said for CORE I know of a handful of talks where I will ask (not tell) the author if they prefer to submit it to big data. At the moment I have no idea where we will land with the scheduling, I dont even have all the tracks in my head. I have learned that if I try to do reviewing and scheduling it tends to become unfair like: when reviewing talk foo....hmmmm we already have too many talks from that projects, so better reject it. instead I review, only thinking of the single talk. And then once we all have reviewed, then I start building the schedule. hope that clears your confusion. rgds jan I. > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 1, 2015, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jan, >>> >>> I would say that it excellently fits into the Apache BD stream, as it is >>> closely related to Big Data products like Apache Hadoop, Apache Hive, >>> Apache Zookeeper, Apache Ambari and others. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will leave it up to Rohit to decide whether to move it to ApacheCon or >>> leave it as it is. But it seems to me that the ApacheCon is already a bit >>> overcrowded. As outlined elswhere by Roman the Trafodion podling can opt >>> for a pitch in the Incubator track to promote itself to other projects' >>> contributors to build its community. >>> >> It need to be a bit crowded, because some talks get rejected. >> >> Incubator is a priority at Core not at big data, but anyhow we are past >> the deadline. >> >> rgds >> jan i >> >> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Pierre Smits >>> >>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>> Services and Retail & Trade >>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:32 PM, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> he has, but it looks a bit as if he should have submitted it to >>>> apacheCON CORE, as part of the incubator. >>>> >>>> We cannot move it, but he can if he wants to. >>>> >>>> Also please be aware that we are not building tracks for big data. >>>> >>>> rgds >>>> jan i. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30 June 2015 at 21:00, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>> >>>>> Can you verify that Rohit Jain has submitted his talk for Apache Big >>>>> Data? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Pierre Smits >>>>> >>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional >>>>> Services and Retail & Trade >>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. >> > >
