Good luck with the 'we' aspect. And due to recent statements I don't have the feeling that I am part of that.
Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 04/20/2015 03:40 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> Leif, >> >> From what I understood from the statements by Ross, Jan, et all in >> another >> thread today (subject: Proposing Tracks for ACEU15, incomplete archive: >> http://apachecon.markmail.org/message/7ezkr5dubt6ota4c) is that we don't >> have to propose/discuss scope, focus and depth of the Apachecon in general >> and of tracks in particular anymore. That is now done by the LF. >> > > We are in an advisory role, since we are the content experts. > > So it's certainly not the case that our voice is silenced. That would be > silly on the part of the LF, since we are both client and customer, in some > sense, for the event. So, we advise, but it's their decision, because it's > their financial risk. > > -- > Rich Bowen - [email protected] - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
