On 11/12/2013 03:49 PM, Tony Stevenson wrote:
I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the
locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed
expired? Or rather re-register it?
I really don't have an opinion on this. I seem to remember that someone
outside of the foundation registered it, and then signed it over to us
(S&S possibly?), but I could be making that up.
Can we possibly agree on one standard? Is the site code sufficiently generic
that we can make the site na11.apacheonc.com, work at www.apachecon.com/2011/na
or something? So we support only one convention.
Yes please. I'd prefer /year/VENUE personally, although
http://apachecon.com/2006/Asia/ is the one weird one that we could
probably leave as is.
Looks like we did in fact use that convention for the longest time.
Looks like it's NA rather than na, although we called it US rather than
NA up through 2010
--Rich
On 12 Nov 2013, at 20:42, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
Mostly I was just commenting that `whois apachecon.eu` doesn't actually have
any info in it, and that `dig apachecon.eu` doesn't return a record.
I expect that what we want is to have apachecon.eu redirect to
http://apachecon.com/c/ and have the 2012 archive put there. Looks like we've
got a variety of different naming conventions for the various past events
listed there, including na11.apachecon.com and apachecon.com/YEAR/VENUE and
apachecon.com/euYEAR :(
On 11/12/2013 03:23 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote:
Hey Tony,
Thank you for your email. I'll have to defer to Rich and Nick to answer your
questions.
Rich/Nick: Please see Tony's questions below and let him know.
Thank you all for your help!!
~M
From: Tony Stevenson <[email protected]>
To: Apache Infrastructure - Private <[email protected]>; Melissa
Warnkin <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Site is down or removed
At what URL exactly would folks like the site published?
The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful?
On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello infra,
Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet.
Please see below. Particularly: > I'm not sure who ended up with that part of
the concom responsibility
when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to
ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static
archive at some suitable hostnames
Nick
Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone
follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up?
============================================
Thank you so much!! Have a great day!!
~M
From: Rich Bowen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: Site is down or removed
On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote:
We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain.
You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did
someone transfer it away, and to who?
A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into
SVN after the event:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com
I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility
when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to
ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static
archive at some suitable hostnames
Nick
Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone
follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up?
Cheers,
Tony
----------------------------------
Tony Stevenson
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.pc-tony.com
GPG - 1024D/51047D66
----------------------------------
--
Rich Bowen
[email protected]
http://rcbowen.com/
Cheers,
Tony
----------------------------------
Tony Stevenson
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.pc-tony.com
GPG - 1024D/51047D66
----------------------------------
--
Rich Bowen
[email protected]
http://rcbowen.com/
