On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote:
        It's now been 7 months since the suggestion that in 2-3 months
        the questions with regard to ApacheCon NA 2014 would be answered.

        I've yet to see those answers, so I'll ask again:

        Any determination of IF/WHEN/WHERE and [within some reasonable
        ballpark] HOW MUCH for ApacheCon NA 2014?

TL;DR - no news, and no longer my responsibility....


Longer Answer - After ApacheCon NA 2013 in Portland, I proposed to the board some changes to the Conference Planning committee/project/role, to better match what I thought was needed after those two ApacheCons and discussions in/around them. The board agreed with some of them, had reservations with others, and instead opted in the May board meeting[1] to "Dissolve the office of Vice President, Conference Planning" (and associated committee).

Unfortunately, the change wasn't as well managed as perhaps it could have been. Not all of the committees/posts taking on the former duties were quite ready, websites were slow to be updated, processes and policies took time to be changed for the new setup, communities felt somewhat unsupported, and external parties sometimes felt ignored. The negotiations with the producer for ACNA13/ACEU12 about new events simillarly stalled in the changeover.

The good news is that things now seem to be sorting themselves out. Communities are starting to do events again, some volunteer energy is returning, policies are being updated, and external parties seem less frustrated. On the ApacheCon front, those now tasked with handling the negotiations and interactions with an external producer have been making progress. There's nothing public on that yet, but based on what I've seen in private, I believe an initial announcement is due in the 6-8 week timeframe. Nothing public yet though on the timescale after that.

I know that some people have given up waiting, which is a shame, but sadly understandable. For others, there is a sign of light up ahead, but I'll have to leave it to those now responsible to reply, if they wish.

Nick

[1] 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_05_15.txt

Reply via email to