On another thought, why not the already existing Camel track chair to be the same for the one that might be named (Enterprise) Integration track ?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nick... > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Nick Burch <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 23/07/12 12:06, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote: >> >>> Maybe we could have a 2nd track which supplements the ApachEE core track >>>> and showcases the different "Enterprise Integration" scenarios. >>>> >>> >>> This sounds reasonable to me and in the direction of the aborted >>> "Integration & Service APIs" track [4]. >>> >>> Maybe that would also fit to Camel and it's parts? >>>> >>> >> If there are the volunteers to run the track, then we can certainly look >> at adding a new one, and maybe rolling the Camel track into it! We'd need >> to make that call soon though. Any takers for being the track chairs? >> > > Good idea, we could name it (Enterprise) Integration track, but as you > said that would need a chair > > >> >> Nick >> > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein > > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
