On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Pierre Smits wrote:
Would it be a neat feature if we would have some kind of 'like' mechanism available in the site of the event for each track, so we all could form our thoughts on how interested the public (intended audience?) is for each track?
I think the planned way to gauge that is by the number of submissions for a track, and on the ratings given to talk proposals in it.
I believe that the ability for people who have submitted talk proposals to rate other talks should be coming this week, but Steve can perhaps confirm? (The website software supports it, it needs a few tweaks before it can go live). If you've experienced the PyCon CFP before, then I'm told it'll be much the same process
Also, would it possible to show for each track how many papers have been submitted as well? This could help the audience and ourselves (PTC et all) with planning?
You should be able to see that in the review process when it's live Nick
