Thanks everybody for the replies. I think this issue has given me the
ammunition I need to justify upgrading to 1.5.

Donal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eddie Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ant Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: <weblogic>, <classpath>, and <wlclasspath>


> Donal-
>
> I had the same problem for the longest time using 1.4.1 and followed the
> same steps you took as well with no results.
>
> In the end, upgrading to 1.5 actually rectified the problem altogether as
> Conot et al made some significant changes (and improvements) in the
behavior
> of the EJB tasks.
>
> So, my recommendation is to upgrade Ant 1.5.
>
>
>
> Cheers!
> Eddie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donal Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 12:08 PM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: <weblogic>, <classpath>, and <wlclasspath>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Ant 1.4.1 and attempting to use the weblogic task. I get
warnings
> about the home and remote interfaces of a bean on the system classpath.
> According to the 1.4.1 javadoc I simply need to use <wlclasspath> to set
the
> standard weblogic classes. But whenever I do this and run ant -verbose I
get
> NoClassDefFound exceptions. I only see jar's in the <wlclasspath> in the
log
> output. Anything in <classpath> gets ignored as soon as I start using
> <wlclasspath>. So what eventually happens is I put all the jars in
> <wlclasspath> and end up back at square one.
>
> Has anybody experienced this before or better yet, know of a solution?
> Perhaps this is why our buildfile is using the java task to fork
> weblogic.ejbc.
>
> Thanks
>
> Donal
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to