Yes of course , it should look like this ``` all - "alle interessierenden Hosts, auch nicht per ansible kontrollierbare" controllable - Alle Hosts, die mit ansible kontrolliert werden koennten fm174 - Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig) hetzner - Alle Hosts bei Hetzner (cloud) virtual_ansible_hosts - Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, aber sie sollen durch (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden virtual_FM174 - Virtuelle Ansible Hosts in FM174
``` [email protected] schrieb am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2023 um 09:47:53 UTC+1: > On 08/02/2023 09:21, Norbert Klamann wrote: > > Hello all, > > i use Ansible to document and manage a small network of computers and > other devices. So I bulit an inventory with several groups and hosts and > defined a bunch of variables on each level to describe what i want to > achieve, Each host and each group has for example a variable named > `host_comment` or `group_comment` respectively. > > > > This is very useful on the host level, but i want to show the group > variables separately in a loop over all groups. > > > > I can show a group variable via `hostvars[host].group_comment`but > because every hosts belongs to several groups i cannot control, whicht name > is displayed. > > > > This template > > ``` > > {% forgroupingroupsifgroup!='ungrouped'%} > > {% forhostingroups[group]%} > > {% ifloop.first%}{% sethvh=hostvars[host]%} > > {{ group }}{{ hvh.group_comment }} > > {% endif%} > > {% endfor%} > > {% endfor%} > > ``` > > > > gives > > ``` > > all Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, aber sie sollen durch > (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden > > lxc_container Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig) > > fm174 Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig) > > hetzner Alle Hosts bei Hetzner (cloud) > > controllable Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig) > > virtual_FM174 Virtuelle Ansible Hosts in FM174 > > virtual_ansible_hosts Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, > aber sie sollen durch (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden > > > > ``` > > I think it is visible that this result makes no sense. > > Hello Norbert, > > can you give an example of the desired output? > > Regards > > Racke > > > > > > Can anyone help here ? > > > > Thanks a lot ! > > > > Norbert > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Ansible Project" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/fadc4912-aaab-4cfa-aa18-22dd5fe1d12dn%40googlegroups.com > > < > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/fadc4912-aaab-4cfa-aa18-22dd5fe1d12dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > >. > > > -- > Automation expert - Ansible and friends > Linux administrator & Debian maintainer > Perl Dancer & conference hopper > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/74860064-0aef-4a92-acb3-4ff9cdfd0efcn%40googlegroups.com.
