I think Dennis's reasoning is good. I would also find this feature 
practical. Would it be possible to do a core module called 'role'?

On Friday, October 4, 2013 5:13:25 PM UTC+3, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> "This does kinda solve the issue, however we want to treat the role as 
> readonly because changing it could break other playbooks."
>
> Ok, I'm confused now. 
>
> What does "readonly" mean?
>
> Just don't modify the role in source control?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Steve Weber <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>  > Saying you don't like ansible and then suggesting people use something 
>> else and linking to it isn't a good way to make friends.   You could have 
>> left that part out.
>>
>> Was not the intention..
>>
>> I have been using Ansible for ~a year and hit many roadblocks throughout 
>> the development.
>> I did add that you are doing a good job keeping up to pace on issues.
>>
>>  > Roles already support dependencies as well since 1.3.
>> This does kinda solve the issue, however we want to treat the role as 
>> readonly because changing it could break other playbooks.
>>
>> Anyway, keep up the good work and best of luck with AWX
>>
>> On Friday, 4 October 2013 09:22:56 UTC-4, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> Saying you don't like ansible and then suggesting people use something 
>>> else and linking to it isn't a good way to make friends.   You could have 
>>> left that part out.
>>>
>>> I'll help you anyway though, but please don't do it again.
>>>
>>> I strongly disagree that roles make any assumptions about whether they 
>>> are for bootstrap/basic/infrastructure/application.   You will see in 
>>> the documentation and code there's nothing in there at all about these 
>>> kinds of things and they are quite general purpose.
>>>
>>> As for a repository of roles, we're working on that.  Stay tuned!
>>>
>>> Roles already support dependencies as well since 1.3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Steve Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I should add that Michael is doing an excellent good job improving 
>>>> these issues.
>>>>
>>>> I'm explicitly glad to see defaults/main.yml added to roles. This was 
>>>> my largest issue with sharing roles.
>>>>  
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Ansible Project" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Michael DeHaan <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> CTO, AnsibleWorks, Inc.
>>> http://www.ansibleworks.com/
>>>
>>>   -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Ansible Project" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Michael DeHaan <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> CTO, AnsibleWorks, Inc.
> http://www.ansibleworks.com/
>
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/626b051f-fb47-4cfd-9d98-be31184a2156%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to