Recursive directory setting is almost never something you want to do. Assume "/foo/bar" doesn't exist and the directory specified is "/foo/bar/baz/gulp/gorp"
The permissions on the leaf node may be good choices, but what should the intermediate permissions be set as? Do they come from bar or gorp?" As such, when doing recursive copying, setting permissions on each leaf node makes sense. Otherwise, just call chmod -R, and it will do what it normally does. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:23 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps I spoke too soon. I found that if I create a directory tree in > one "file:" task: > > file: path=/top/dir/path/to/directory owner=user group=mygroup > mode=755 state=directory recurse=yes > > only "directory" has the correct owner and permissions. But if I > subsequently call file again and just specify the entry point to my tree: > > file: path=/top/dir/path owner=user group=mygroup mode=755 > state=directory recurse=yes > > then the permissions and owner from "path" down were correctly set. And > really, after thinking about it a bit, I wouldn't have wanted the first > step to have set everything as that would have changed the permissions and > owner on the upper level directories too, which is not what I wanted. > Perhaps the module needs a "chdir" argument to move to the top directory > (chdir=/top/dir in my example), and then "path" can specify a relative path > instead of an absolute path. That way recursive permissions can be set > from that point down. > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:19:06 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote: >> >> >> So, a year and a half and several releases later, still not working? >> It would be really nice not to have to set directory permissions in a >> separate step. >> >> >> >> On Sunday, February 17, 2013 6:16:57 AM UTC-8, Michael DeHaan wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:42 AM, shadowy m <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Thanks for the link. As long as I know it's supposed to work I'll >>> wait for >>> > the fix I guess. >>> > >>> > Is there another way to do this in playbooks? >>> >>> >>> shell: chown -R user foo && chmod -R 644 foo >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/b62ca1f0-ff9e-4548-b2c4-cef54a993196%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/b62ca1f0-ff9e-4548-b2c4-cef54a993196%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CA%2BnsWgwP3wcx_06hF8ZPLXRe3trLHAScKc1_ya6bULZj5kHynQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
