Maybe if I discuss what I'm trying to do there will be a better solution so 
that variable scope doesn't matter.

I have an SOA architecture (40 python web services) and want each one 
defined as their own role because they can be deployed on their own nodes 
or on shared nodes.

So my tree structure looks like this:

http://paste.ofcode.org/aWr2A77wxXezkanhWHm5nC

For every role I have a line in my group_vars/all file that defines 
metadata about the role like what nginx port they use, if they use 
requirements.txt, etc.  This looks like this:

$ cat group_vars/all.yml 
---
services:
  anonweb:
    repo: anonweb
    version: upgrade_latest_packages
    port: 8500
    nginx_port: 6005
    paths:
      - /

  addressbookweb:
    repo: AddressBookWeb
    version: develop
    port: 8765
    nginx_port: 6014
    paths:
      - /addressbook

<snip>

and so if I want to deploy the usersvc role to 3 nodes in the staging 
environment I do the following:

ansible-playbook -i nova.py -u monkey deploy.yml --extra-vars 
"group=mc3-usersvc role=usersvc"

but then after I get them deployed I need to run my loadbalancer role to 
grab the hosts from my dynamic inventory
file and each of the nodes to the load balancer configuration, which means 
it needs to grab the nginx port and everything
that it will be proxying to on each node.

All this works as expected because I've defined 1 specific role I want to 
deploy so the var is globally scoped and can be used
every where but if I want to update the load balancer for *all* roles I 
have no way of getting what the "current" role is, so all my
current configuration fails.

Which brings us to where we are now, I tried to define  role/<role>/vars/ 
 file   with one setting role=<role>  that way all the
configuration would still run.   But I forgot to to set this in 3 roles and 
they ended up getting configuration for the role that ran before
them because the variable scope was contained to where I defined it (like 
it would be in standard python without the global keyword).

This caused mayhem because now my load balancer is routing to the wrong 
nodes and it isn't very clear *why*.  I want it to fail and
alert me that I forgot to define a variable.
----------------
I understand having the ability to set a variable at a more global scope is 
important but I think by default it should not.

So with my minor example, the pythonapp is generic configuration and one of 
the checks it does is "when: use_req_text is defined" and each role can 
decide if it should use a requirements.txt to install.

My problem now is that only half of my 40 projects use requirements.txt but 
since Ansible is leaking the information it tries to use requirements.txt 
for all of them.

Is my only option to have to explicitly set this var in every role and 
accept the fact that forgetting to do so will have bad consequences?

On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 7:52:59 AM UTC-7, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> It doesn't leak information in any way that is a problem, but rather the 
> variable is still in scope.
>
> Variables from roles are available in other roles, but always guaranteed 
> to be used WITHIN that role.
>
> Thus if you set in one role X, "a: 42"
>
> and another role Y, "a: 44"
>
> ansible is so written that role X always gets 42 and tasks in role Y 
> always get 44.
>
> They won't clobber one another.
>
> Having one role being able to define variables for another is however 
> important, for instance, a role might define presensce in a particular 
> datacenter and define a server address used in other roles.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:17 AM, John Anderson <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I have the following structure:
>>
>> roles/pythonapp/
>> roles/billingsvc/
>> roles/usersvc/
>>
>>
>> pythonapp is a generic set of instructions like cloning and installing a 
>> python package, billingsvc and usersvc both include it in their tasks.
>>
>> I have a variable that I set in billingsvc/vars/main.yml and I don't want 
>> usersvc to see this var but as soon as billingsvc finishes it runs usersvc 
>> and the var is there.
>>
>> Is there anyway to prevent this leaking of information?  I've defined the 
>> var in the role vars section specifically to keep it isolated from 
>> everything else.
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Ansible Project" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/d96b6d38-e618-4c8a-b06a-5843a3cf36df%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/d96b6d38-e618-4c8a-b06a-5843a3cf36df%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/7133b4d5-74e7-48ef-b78a-1dca39e607fa%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to