Excerpts from Dmitry Makovey's message of 2014-06-04 18:17:04 -0400:
> Winning combination turned out to be:
>
> ( groups['A']+groups['B'] ) | unique
>
> I do like how simple it looks vs
>
> ( groups['A']|union (groups['B']))| unique
Just FYI, the 'unique filter in the latter form is redundant; this
should work fine:
groups['A']|union(groups['B')
Sets, by definition, have no duplicate items.
--
Morgan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/1401978298-sup-8285%40al.wesleyan.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
