"You're right, anyhow this is a regression introduced with ansible 1.5.0"
(A) I don't think we can say any possible behavior where something strange used to work and doesn't is a regression, unless that behavior was either documented or had a unit test for it. (B) This variable really ought to be templated at an earlier level anyway. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Dario Bertini <[email protected]> wrote: > You're right, anyhow this is a regression introduced with ansible 1.5.0 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/a53fa008-066a-4ac0-a8da-919f4e8e9b72%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/a53fa008-066a-4ac0-a8da-919f4e8e9b72%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAEVJ8QOpA4jKqm-h3gMdzX_PTR_WuXYc-cd2wkzGQL-r1epAuQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
