[email protected] wrote: > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-28.txt is now available. It is a > work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach (ANIMA) WG > of the IETF.
> Title: A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols
> Name: draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-28.txt
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-28
This version deals with the AD review comments from Mahesh.
They are all complete, and I don't think there was anything particularly
controversial that the WG needed to be consulted on. Of course, read the
diff and disagree. (Or send text)
If you want to see how I dealt with each comment, then one could start at:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/116
Each sub-issue deals with a type of comment, such as:
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/116?issue=anima-wg%7Cvoucher%7C119
Where you can see a comment like:
mcr added a commit that references this issue 3 days ago
remove redundant word -grouping from names of groupings. close #119
with a link to, e.g.,
https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/commit/ac84b245a12107a7271a984926075e3100444ac6
In the process of dealing with references from the YANG modules that did not
lead anywhere, I wound up removing some BCP14 language about supported
algorithms. See https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/125
and also https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/346
This is not just about for (D)TLS itself, but in effect also supported
algorithms for the IDevID and registrar server certificate.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
