John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote: > William Atwood wrote: >> For discussion of the feasibility of using BRSKI in a very constrained > environment (specifically, LoRaWAN)
> I don't want to say that the examined LoRaWAN is not “very
> constrained,” but my understanding is that even cBRSKI relies on DTLS
> with X.509, which we know is highly problematic for "very very
> constrained" radio networks.
Yes, so draft-ietf-lake-authz is a similiar BRSKI model with EDHOC+OSCORE
replacing (D)TLS/EST.
(Whether it's small enough for LoRaWAN, depends upon a number of details)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
