> URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-04.txtAppendix C is updated. Jim found that I had done the COSE SIGN1 body wrong. Specifically, my code did not CBOR encode the content before signing. (Naturally, my code interoperated with itself) I have corrected this and updated the examples. Now that the contents are CBOR encoding, one can not in the DIAG format easily the voucher(request) object embedded. I have thus far included the CBOR DIAG output as well as the base64 encoding of the CBOR. I think that there is little value in including the DIAG format output as there is little one can see directly. I could artifically decode the inner content as an examplar; I'd have to think about if I can automate this easily, otherwise things will get out of sync. The -04 version has some unfortunate formatting oops, which I'll fix before monday and repost. I don't expect to make any other substantive changes other than a few grammar typos I noticed. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
