If you want a framework with persistence built in, use meteor. Angular is for building rich client applications, and has literally nothing to say about the server.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, António Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello i read some pro/cons about these 2 but i´m choosing meteor because > it has persistence included. > With angular i´m lost and found only a simple persistence api ( > www.deployd.com) > but deployd is somewhat DEAD! > > and meteor has all of that included. I dont need to learn new stuff > > > I need some advice because i really like angular but dont want to waste > too much time learning how to store data in the server. > And firebase is not an alternative in my case. > > Regards > António > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "AngularJS" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- chrisrhoden -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
