Here is a plunk: http://plnkr.co/edit/UYyUY4U1lY09mH3kzLAy
You can see that the collections get set in the scope, but it doesn't end up being the scope that is used in the ng-included partials. I wanted to avoid doing anything like using $parent. Thanks for taking a look! --m On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Sander Elias <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I think I have spotted a couple of small mistakes. If you would have put > up a plunk or a fiddle, I would be able to play around with your code, and > would be able to give a better insight. > > Regards > Sander > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "AngularJS" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
