And that still means it needs to keep the old activity around so the thread can use it.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:47 PM, CraigsRace <[email protected]> wrote: > > It would only be a forward reference (from the destroyed activity to > the new activity), not a back reference. > > On Aug 30, 2:34 pm, Romain Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > However, couldn't the Android framework just forward any requests from > > > a destroyed activity, to the newly created Activity, saving us > > > developers the pain of handling it ourselves? > > > > To do this, the framework would have to keep around references to all > > previous Activities pretty much forever. Which would be a large waste > > of resources. > > > > -- > > Romain Guy > > Android framework engineer > > [email protected] > > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time > > to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on > > public forums, where I and others can see and answer them > > > -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer [email protected] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
