I'm not familiar at all with the camera code and the dependencies that you might find, so I can't give you any advice here, sorry.
JBQ On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Hans <[email protected]> wrote: > > Much appreciated. > > I'd like to ask you one more question if I could JBQ. > > I have built all kinds of things with Android now, from simple > activities, to OpenGL applications, to out of process servers running > in services with inter-process communication and callbacks, et > cetera. All of this is great in Android and relatively simple in > comparison to doing it in other platforms; however, just trying to > build Camera.apk is proving problematic in that I'm probably just > taking the wrong approach. > > Do you have any suggestions (which I'll not hold you to) for building > Camera.apk because I, of course, end up needing to reference classes > outside of both the SDK and the Camera.git source base (such as > com.android.text.format.DateFormat which I found in the base.git > repositiory) and not being an expert Eclipse/Java person I simply > tried linking in the base framework source folders. That, of course, > doesn't work. All of the base code references a different set of > resources. > > Should I be building the base code as its own project, and linking > that project to my Camera project's build path? > > Sorry if this is too far beneath your purview, but I'm struggling to > do something I had hoped would be simple - just build Camera.apk > without any changes... > > I've googled on this a bunch but found nothing but vagaries that make > it sound like no ones actually doing this right now. > > Thanks, > Hans > > On Mar 15, 11:40 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh, I see. The real problem is that the class in question was deleted >> a long time ago, but the manifest still lists it by mistake. The >> manifest should be updated. For your own purposes you can just remove >> the line in question in the manifest. >> >> JBQ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Hans <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Much appreciated Jean-Baptiste. >> >> > Would the source for this actually be available to a phone OEM or ISP >> > (I'm not sure what term to use for a branded network provider) such as >> > T-Mobile. If so, I have contacts there who could do the build for me; >> > or, would this only be something in-house at Google? I'm just looking >> > for what my requirements would be in order to build the Camera >> > application if truly necessary. >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Hans >> >> > Appreciated - Hans >> >> > On Mar 15, 10:58 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I haven't looked in detail, but this looks like yet another case of a >> >> platform application that uses private platform APIs and therefore >> >> can't be built against the SDK. >> >> >> JBQ >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Hans <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > Manifest for Camera.git application lists this service. >> >> >> > I am trying to simply build the Camera application and am unable to do >> >> > so. There have been several small issues (such as a resource file >> >> > having values not compatible with the latest SDK), but this one seems >> >> > a bit more of a problem ;)... >> >> >> > Anyone successfully built the full (not commented out here and there) >> >> > Camera application? >> >> >> > Tips appreciated. >> >> >> > Thanks :) >> >> >> > Hans >> >> >> -- >> >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >> >> Android Engineer, Google. >> >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private >> >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further >> >> warning.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >> - Show quoted text - >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru >> Android Engineer, Google. >> >> Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private >> will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further >> warning.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > -- Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru Android Engineer, Google. Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further warning. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
