Yeah it's currently not possible. I can understand wanting to generate them into a different package, but would be somewhat opposed to allowing a different class name. The trade-off of losing consistency between applications for allowing people to use some other name (why?) doesn't seem worth it to me.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right now I believe that's unfortunately not possible - and it's > clearly a feature that would be nice to add. > > JBQ > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Raja Nagendra Kumar > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > aapt while generating the resources, is it possible to provide a > > different package name for the generated R.java class. Currently it > > seems to use the same package name as the one in manfifest defination > > of AndroidManifest.xml > > > > <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"; > > package="com.tejasoft.dialer.mobile.android"> > > > > Also, is there a way to give custom class name instead of default R > > name say Resources > > > > Regards, > > Raja Nagendra Kumar, > > C.T.O > > www.tejasoft.com > > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Android Engineer, Google. > > > > -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer [email protected] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
