On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Aitor Mendaza Ormaza <[email protected]> wrote: > I jut wanted to know if there was a way around of using class only for > storing data, as it will not have any methods attached to it, and object > handling can be expensive.
http://java.sun.com/developer/Books/shiftintojava/page1.html "Upon first exposure to the Java programming language, some C programmers believe that classes are too heavyweight to replace structs under some circumstances, but this is not the case. Degenerate classes consisting solely of data fields are nearly equivalent to C structs in every respect." If you choose not to believe Mr. Bloch, that is your decision. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy Android Training in NYC: http://marakana.com/training/android/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
