Any tips on this? Or are we on our own?  This is a big issue for us
right now.

On Dec 9, 10:40 pm, John Spurlock <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would you mind clarifying this a bit?  What are some techniques a
> "legitimate" background service hosting a running mediaplayer can
> employ to ensure that it does not get killed by the os?
>
> We are running into this right now - our app (hosting a running
> mediaplayer) is hosted in a service, and we are seeing our process
> killed abruptly in logcat.  Ironically the more efficient we make the
> service footprint (reducing gcs -> less cpu), the higher the odds that
> it becomes a candidate for removal!
>
> Thanks,
> - John
>
> On Nov 23, 7:47 pm, "Dianne Hackborn" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Please please please be sure to stop the service when it is no longer
> > needed.  For a media player, this generally means only having it in the
> > running state when it is actively playing music; otherwise it should only be
> > needed when there are clients bound to it.
>
> > If you don't stop your services, then the system has to assume it is needed
> > forever and can't remove your process to allow for other things the user is
> > actually doing.  I think this is actually one of our biggest third party
> > application issues, applications that just starts a service and never stops
> > it.  This sucks for the user, and just should not be done.  In fact there is
> > already code in the system to look for services that have been running a
> > long time without others doing things to them to let them be killed, but
> > it's pretty clear we'll need to be even more brutal about this. :(  (Which
> > sucks for things that really do want to run for a long time, like a media
> > player, but it's not clear at all to me what to do about them.)
>
> > Also, there was a suggestion earlier to try running the service in another
> > process.  Multiple processes is again something to be careful of, and to
> > stay away from unless you really need them -- processes are quite
> > heavy-weight entities, so shouldn't be thrown around lightly.
>
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:42 PM, G <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > EUREKA! I've figured it out based on some of the documentation I
> > > missed. For those who also have trouble...
>
> > > The docs for ContextWrapper.startService(Intent service) includes the
> > > following line...
> > > "Using startService() overrides the default service lifetime that is
> > > managed by bindService(Intent, ServiceConnection, int): it requires
> > > the service to remain running until stopService(Intent) is called,
> > > regardless of whether any clients are connected to it."
>
> > > This is the trick, simply run startService() before you attempt to
> > > bind to it! So before, my onCreate contained:
> > >         bindService(new Intent(MDService.class.getName()),
> > > mConnection, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
>
> > > Now this has been replaced by:
> > >        Intent i = new Intent(MDService.class.getName());
> > >        startService(i);
> > >        bindService(i, mConnection, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
>
> > > After that change, calling unbindService(mConnection) does NOT destroy
> > > the service :)
>
> > > So starting a service by binding it from an activity links the
> > > service's life-cycle with that of the activity. While starting the
> > > Service first, gives it it's own lifecycle, and you can still bind to
> > > it right after. (And you still know the service will only actually be
> > > started once.)
>
> > > Also, doing this seems to have alleviated my 2nd problem that I
> > > described in my 1st post, but this requires a little more testing
> > > before i can confirm it.
>
> > > On Nov 23, 3:09 pm, G <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I just realized that the in API Demo for Remote Service Binding, the
> > > > service is destroyed when the activity is destroyed as well. So it's
> > > > no help in this case. Can anyone point to a code sample in which a
> > > > service outlives it's binding in an activity? Do I need to use a
> > > > BroadcastReceiver or something? I'm very confused :(
>
> > > > On Nov 23, 2:46 pm, G <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > That is what I've been trying to do, below is the service definition
> > > > > in my AndroidManifest.xml file
>
> > > > >     <service android:name=".MDService" android:process=":remote">
> > > > >         <intent-filter>
> > > > >                 <action
> > > android:name="com.episode6.android.carolla.MDService"></
> > > > > action>
> > > > >                 </intent-filter>
> > > > >         </service>
>
> > > > > And I bind the service in my activity with the following call...
>
> > > > > bindService(new Intent(MDService.class.getName()), mConnection,
> > > > > Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
>
> > > > > And whenever I run unbindService(mConnection); the service still gets
> > > > > destroyed.
>
> > > > > On Nov 23, 1:52 pm, Mark Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > G wrote:
> > > > > > > 1) When my main activity is destroyed, my service is getting
> > > destroyed
> > > > > > > along with it. The service's onDestroy get's called, playback
> > > stops,
> > > > > > > the notification gets cleared. How can I avoid this?
>
> > > > > > Have you tried making your service a remote service, one that runs 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > its own process?
>
> > >http://code.google.com/android/samples/ApiDemos/src/com/example/andro...
>
> > > > > > I haven't tried a remote service yet myself, so I'm not 100% certain
> > > it
> > > > > > will resolve this problem.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com
>
> > > > > > Android Training on the Ranch! -- Mar 16-20, 2009
> > >http://www.bignerdranch.com/schedule.shtml
>
> > --
> > Dianne Hackborn
> > Android framework engineer
> > [email protected]
>
> > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > provide private support.  All such questions should be posted on public
> > forums, where I and others can see and answer them.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to