Sorry, at this point any native code is outside of the SDK. Using the C++ audio libraries is way way way outside of the SDK.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Dorn Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dianne, > > Hmm, sorry, didn't realize I had gone off-topic. I still plan to > develop in the SDK. > > Is it possible use the SDK and still access one custom .so ? If so, > am I still off-topic? > > Regards, > > -Dorn > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Dianne Hackborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Could you please move this to android-platform or another of the open > source > > groups? Thanks. > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Dorn Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> David, > >> > >> Thank you very very much for the tips. I've gotten as far as > >> downloading the android source code (onto a clean ubuntu VM I built > >> for the job) and doing an initial make (which generated quite a lot of > >> whining level errors but seemed to complete ok). > >> > >> I'm so-so at Java but a pretty old hand at C/C++ so hopefully I will > >> be able to work through the remaining steps. Can you recommend any > >> other similar interface classes I could examine for general clues? > >> > >> Once I get all this done, will the .so in the .apk be able to go > >> through the marketplace and run on a real G1 or will I only be able to > >> play with in on the emulator? > >> > >> In any case, I will write progress reports to the list and make the > >> code available to all if I succeed. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Dorn Hetzel > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:23 PM, davidsparks davidsparks > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > The native interface is called AudioRecord.h. You'll need to download > >> > the > >> > Android source code, write a JNI interface to AudioRecord, build a .so > >> > library that you can include in your APK, write a Java wrapper class > for > >> > it, > >> > and then load the library from your Java wrapper. > >> > > >> > Hope that helps. > >> > > >> > Dave > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Dorn Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> David, > >> >> > >> >> It looks like the MediaRecorder functionality is a non-start for my > >> >> application since I need to process the audio as it is coming in, not > >> >> some time later after the recording is complete. Can you provide me > >> >> some clue as to where to find information on the native interface, > >> >> since I would rather be able to at least make some progress with the > >> >> rest of my application while waiting for the next version. Without > >> >> some alternative to MediaRecorder I will be simply unable to proceed. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks! > >> >> > >> >> -Dorn > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > It is the only supported method in SDK 1.0. There is a native > >> >> > interface to audio input, but it will be changing in a future > release > >> >> > and I strongly advise against using it. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 19, 8:26 am, dorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> Is the MediaRecorder the only method available to acquire audio > from > >> >> >> the microphone, or is there a lower level method available? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Nov 14, 4:59 pm, Dave Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The MediaRecorder is currently hardcoded for AMR-NB and is > >> >> >> > intended > >> >> >> > for MMS messages. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You can expect improvements toaudiorecording in a future SDK. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Nov 14, 12:26 pm, ste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > I'm testing out the MediaRecorder'saudiorecording capability, > >> >> >> > > and > >> >> >> > > the quality of theaudiowas less then I was expecting. It was > >> >> >> > > significantly lower then the quality you get while speaking on > >> >> >> > > the > >> >> >> > > phone, and sounded very digitized. > >> >> >> > > I've tested both the 3gpp and MPEG_4 encoding options, and > >> >> >> > > noticed > >> >> >> > > the > >> >> >> > > same quality. > >> >> >> > > Has anyone else noticed this, and is this an issue with the > >> >> >> > > phone's > >> >> >> > > hardware or the MediaRecorder's capabilities? If it's the > >> >> >> > > latter, > >> >> >> > > is > >> >> >> > > the quality of recording something which is planned to be > >> >> >> > > improved? > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Dianne Hackborn > > Android framework engineer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to > > provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public > > forums, where I and others can see and answer them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
