It looks like the superclass of com/android/commandro/activities/AddLocationActivity$LocationActivityOverlay is not part of the public API. You need to fix your code.
BTW, you should not be using the package name com.android. This package is used for core APIs and applications. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Alex Pisarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, if private inner classes are still allowed, can someone explain > why my application is not getting deployed properly? > > Thanks, > Alex > > On 19 авг, 00:54, Alex Pisarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Justin, >> >> I was talking about my own code which is not properly deployed (I am >> sorry for using com.android.commandro package for some of my own >> classes - that's probably why you were confused) ;) >> >> If there is no restriction, can you please tell me why application is >> not loading properly? What is wrong with DEX? I can send my APK to you >> guys if needed. >> >> On Aug 19, 1:20 am, "Justin (Google Employee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Okay, I think we're all getting confused by overloaded words here. >> >> > Alex, I believe you are asking about non-public APIs, that is >> > undocumented classes. These classes are no longer accessible, I >> > believe in M5 some undocumented classes could be accessed by >> > application code. The reason access is disallowed is because, well, >> > they're not public APIs. >> >> > Shane, I believe you are inferring something about Java private and >> > inner classes. There is, of course, no restriction on creating Java >> > private or inner classes on Android. >> >> > Hopefully this clarifies things. >> >> > Cheers, >> > Justin >> > Android Team @ Google >> >> > On Aug 18, 2:07 pm, Alex Pisarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Justin, >> >> > > Is there any reasonable explaination why private classes are banned >> > > now? >> >> > > Regards, >> > > Alex >> >> > > On 18 авг, 14:02, "Justin (Google Employee)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > What do you mean by 'internal' classes? You mean inner classes or >> > > > private classes? If you mean private classes, I believe, yes, this is >> > > > now no longer allowed. >> >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Justin >> > > > Android Team @ Google >> >> > > > On Aug 18, 1:50 pm, Alex Pisarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > I ported my app, did a clean build and when trying to deploy it to >> > > > > the >> > > > > emulator I get the following error: >> >> > > > > >adb install AndroCom.apk >> >> > > > > 1882 KB/s (0 bytes in 2048642.001s) >> > > > > pkg: /data/local/tmp/AndroCom.apk >> > > > > Failure [-11] >> >> > > > > adb logcat output: >> >> > > > > D/PackageParser( 54): Scanning package: /data/app/vmdl38741.tmp >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 4942 objects / 310576 bytes in 55ms >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 3353 objects / 354784 bytes in 52ms >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 6596 objects / 290648 bytes in 57ms >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 20120 objects / 868592 bytes in 86ms >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 20197 objects / 732088 bytes in 82ms >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 54): GC freed 20071 objects / 728032 bytes in 96ms >> > > > > D/PackageManager( 54): Scanning package com.android.commandro >> > > > > I/PackageManager( 54): /data/app/vmdl38741.tmp changed; unpacking >> > > > > I/dalvikvm( 27): Opening files: input='/data/app/vmdl38741.tmp' >> > > > > cache='/data/d >> > > > > alvik-cache/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 27): DexInv: --- BEGIN 'vmdl38741.tmp' (bootstrap=0) >> > > > > --- >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 27): DexInv: waiting for verify+opt, pid=209 >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 209): Unable to resolve superclass of Lcom/android/ >> > > > > commandro/activi >> > > > > ties/AddLocationActivity$LocationActivityOverlay; (885) >> > > > > D/dalvikvm( 209): Link of class 'Lcom/android/commandro/activities/ >> > > > > AddLocationA >> > > > > ctivity$LocationActivityOverlay;' failed >> >> > > > > I get tons of other "link of class blah-blah" failed errors - merely >> > > > > for every internal class of the application... >> >> > > > > What's wrong - we're not allowed to have internal classes anymore or >> > > > > what?- Скрыть цитируемый текст - >> >> > > > - Показать цитируемый текст -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > - Show quoted text -- Скрыть цитируемый текст - >> >> - Показать цитируемый текст - > > > -- Romain Guy www.curious-creature.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new Android 0.9 SDK beta! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/08/announcing-beta-release-of-android-sdk.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
