Jeremy wrote: > I think the only > really intriguing bit of information from the User Report, when used > to track sessions, is the total number of sessions. This can be a > useful metric -- especially when tracked over time. Another "meta" > metric could be useful too: average number of pages requested. This is > not too hard to post-process.
Well, I agree mostly. Another interesting metric, IMHO, would be the number of sessions that reach a specific page (e.g. checkout, download) vs. total number of sessions (though you need to run Analog a couple of times to get that). I was wondering, though: Is there an area that Analog will not cover because ClickTracks does? I don't mean to offend, but when I started using Analog, Stephen was still in the academic world -- things were pretty clear cut. Now he's working for ClickTracks and I must say I'm a bit baffled as to the relation between Analog and ClickTracks. +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
