Hey Amar,

On 5/20/2022 3:49 PM, Somalapuram Amaranath wrote:
Allocate memory for register value and use the same values for devcoredump.
Remove dump_stack reset register dumps.

Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h         | 1 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 9 ++++++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c  | 7 +++----
  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index 76df583663c7..c79d9992b113 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -1042,6 +1042,7 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
/* reset dump register */
        uint32_t                        *reset_dump_reg_list;
+       uint32_t                        *reset_dump_reg_value;
        int                             num_regs;
struct amdgpu_reset_domain *reset_domain;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
index eedb12f6b8a3..942fdbd316f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ static ssize_t 
amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_write(struct file *f,
  {
        struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device 
*)file_inode(f)->i_private;
        char reg_offset[11];
-       uint32_t *new, *tmp = NULL;
+       uint32_t *new, *tmp = NULL, *tmp_value = NULL;
        int ret, i = 0, len = 0;
do {
@@ -1709,17 +1709,24 @@ static ssize_t 
amdgpu_reset_dump_register_list_write(struct file *f,
                i++;
        } while (len < size);
+ new = krealloc_array(tmp_value, i, sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);

tmp_value is initialized to NULL, which means krealloc_array() will behave like kmalloc_array(), is there any particular reason we are adding this variable at all just to use krealloc_array(), and why not use kmalloc_array() directly ?

+       if (!new) {
+               ret = -ENOMEM;
+               goto error_free;
+       }
        ret = down_write_killable(&adev->reset_domain->sem);
        if (ret)
                goto error_free;
swap(adev->reset_dump_reg_list, tmp);
+       swap(adev->reset_dump_reg_value, new);
        adev->num_regs = i;
        up_write(&adev->reset_domain->sem);
        ret = size;
error_free:
        kfree(tmp);
+       kfree(new);
        return ret;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 4daa0e893965..963c897a76e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -4720,15 +4720,14 @@ int amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_device 
*adev,
static int amdgpu_reset_reg_dumps(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
  {
-       uint32_t reg_value;
        int i;
lockdep_assert_held(&adev->reset_domain->sem);
-       dump_stack();
This should be a part of different patch, where you can give some background on why are we removing this.
for (i = 0; i < adev->num_regs; i++) {
-               reg_value = RREG32(adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i]);
-               trace_amdgpu_reset_reg_dumps(adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i], 
reg_value);
+               adev->reset_dump_reg_value[i] = 
RREG32(adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i]);
+               trace_amdgpu_reset_reg_dumps(adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i],
+                               adev->reset_dump_reg_value[i]);
        }
return 0;

- Shashank

Reply via email to