[AMD Official Use Only]

The log from tester says it is the drm framebuffer BO being busy.

I just feel there is lack of time for its fence to be signaled.
As a delay works too in my test.
But the warning is a little annoying.

________________________________________
发件人: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2022年4月13日 15:30
收件人: Pan, Xinhui; [email protected]
抄送: Deucher, Alexander
主题: AW: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Make sure ttm delayed work finished

We don't need that.

TTM only reschedules when the BOs are still busy.

And if the BOs are still busy when you unload the driver we have much bigger 
problems that this TTM worker :)

Regards,
Christian

________________________________
Von: Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2022 05:08
An: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian 
<[email protected]>; Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>
Betreff: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Make sure ttm delayed work finished

ttm_device_delayed_workqueue would reschedule itself if there is pending
BO to be destroyed. So just one flush + cancel_sync is not enough. We
still see lru_list not empty warnging.

Fix it by waiting all BO to be destroyed.

Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 6f47726f1765..e249923eb9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -3957,11 +3957,17 @@ static void amdgpu_device_unmap_mmio(struct 
amdgpu_device *adev)
  */
 void amdgpu_device_fini_hw(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
 {
+       int pending = 1;
+
         dev_info(adev->dev, "amdgpu: finishing device.\n");
         flush_delayed_work(&adev->delayed_init_work);
-       if (adev->mman.initialized) {
+       while (adev->mman.initialized && pending) {
                 flush_delayed_work(&adev->mman.bdev.wq);
-               ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev);
+               pending = ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev);
+               if (pending) {
+                       ttm_bo_unlock_delayed_workqueue(&adev->mman.bdev, true);
+                       msleep((HZ / 100) < 1) ? 1 : HZ / 100);
+               }
         }
         adev->shutdown = true;

--
2.25.1

Reply via email to