The name is kind of correct. It means "64B with no 128B cache line straddling", which really means just 64B independent blocks with a small modification to support DCC image stores. They are not true 128B independent blocks.
Marek On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:35 PM Joshua Ashton <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we please add documentation for this enum? > > This was not necessarily a typo, but me misunderstanding and stuff it > working in my testing. > > I guess I don't understand why hubp_ind_block_64b_no_128bcl is for 64b > && 128b when it specifically says "no_128" in the name. > > Is there something about it I am missing or is it just misleading naming? > > - Joshie 🐸✨ > > On 9/30/21 17:14, Marek Olšák wrote: > > I've also amended the version bump that I forgot to do: > > > > -#define KMS_DRIVER_MINOR 43 > > +#define KMS_DRIVER_MINOR 44 > > > > Marek > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM Alex Deucher <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:50 AM Marek Olšák <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just discovered this typo. Please review. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Marek > > > >
