On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:56 AM Lazar, Lijo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [AMD Public Use]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alex 
> Deucher
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 10:48 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: enable DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME and 
> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND flags
>
> Once the device has runtime suspended, we don't need to power it back up 
> again for system suspend.  Likewise for resume, we don't to power up the 
> device again on resume only to power it back off again via runtime pm because 
> it's still idle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> index b4780182f990..b78847fa769b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ int amdgpu_driver_load_kms(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
> unsigned long flags)
>                 if (amdgpu_device_supports_atpx(dev) &&
>                     !amdgpu_is_atpx_hybrid())
>                         dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev->dev, 
> DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE);
> +               /* we want direct complete for BOCO */
> +               if ((amdgpu_device_supports_atpx(dev) &&
> +                   amdgpu_is_atpx_hybrid()) ||
> +                   amdgpu_device_supports_boco(dev))
> +                       dev_pm_set_driver_flags(dev->dev, 
> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND |
> +                                               DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME);
>
> Device runtime suspend callback does -
>         amdgpu_device_suspend(drm_dev, false)
>
> System suspend callback does -
>         amdgpu_device_suspend(drm_dev, true)
>
> One of the effects of this flag is for KFD to decide whether to evict all 
> processes. It is done during system suspend but not during runtime device 
> suspend. Will that have an impact if  the system suspend routine is skipped 
> in this way?

+ Rajneesh

Can you comment on this?  Idea of this patch is to not wake the device
for system suspend and resume if it's already in runtime suspend.

Alex

>
> Thanks,
> Lijo
>
>                 pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev->dev);
>                 pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev->dev, 5000);
>                 pm_runtime_allow(dev->dev);
> --
> 2.29.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&amp;data=04%7C01%7Clijo.lazar%40amd.com%7C8a6f7c5bbab84c6e71c408d8c79e7edd%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637478830856688013%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=55Rfj9pO3cnGBiB1DkJ9yuyMMrKOvxhgYDajhIeUNkI%3D&amp;reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to