Former comment looks to be one intended behavior in code, actually it's not. So correct it.
Suggested-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c index af341a272e30..82476f6acfad 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c @@ -4374,7 +4374,12 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle; int r; - /* limit gds clearing operation in cold boot sequence */ + /* + * Temp workaround to fix the issue that CP firmware fails to + * update read pointer when CPDMA is writing clearing operation + * to GDS in suspend/resume sequence on several cards. So just + * limit this operation in cold boot sequence. + */ if (!adev->in_suspend) { r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); if (r) -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
