From: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Souptick Joarder <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <[email protected]>
---
 mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 0423f4ca3a7e09..73c8af4827fe87 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 
        range->hmm = hmm;
        kref_get(&hmm->kref);
-       list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
+       list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
 
        /*
         * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
                return;
 
        mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-       list_del_rcu(&range->list);
+       list_del(&range->list);
        mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
 
        /* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
-- 
2.22.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to