Am 18.06.19 um 12:31 schrieb Xiao, Jack:
job->preamble_status was accidently dropped from the combination value
of status varaiable which is the parameter of some ring level function.
The patch is to add it back.

Signed-off-by: Jack Xiao <[email protected]>

For now Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]>, cause we need to get this fixed ASAP.

But now the question is why do we actually have two fields in the job for the same status?

Christian.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
index 90cc084..6882eeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned 
num_ibs,
skip_preamble = ring->current_ctx == fence_ctx;
        if (job && ring->funcs->emit_cntxcntl) {
+               status |= job->preamble_status;
                status |= job->preemption_status;
                amdgpu_ring_emit_cntxcntl(ring, status);
        }

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to