On 2019-02-01 12:31 p.m., [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 10:28:13AM -0500, Bhawanpreet Lakha wrote: >> From: John Barberiz <[email protected]> >> [How] >> msleep is inaccurate for small values. Used udelay >> instead for accuracy. > > Hi, > > Should it be the case for non-DC displayport code too? >
I don't think we're actually using this code on Linux. It's part of the shared codebase with Windows. Apparently there msleep would often sleep longer than 1ms. drm_dp_dpcd_access already has a tighter bound on the sleep between retries (500-600 us), so I imagine we're fine there. Harry > regards, > _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
