On 05/25/2018 05:08 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 24.05.2018 um 22:15 schrieb [email protected]:
From: Boyuan Zhang <[email protected]>
Add jpeg to amdgpu_vcn
Signed-off-by: Boyuan Zhang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.h
index 2fd7db8..648f662 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vcn.h
@@ -55,9 +55,11 @@ struct amdgpu_vcn {
const struct firmware *fw; /* VCN firmware */
struct amdgpu_ring ring_dec;
struct amdgpu_ring ring_enc[AMDGPU_VCN_MAX_ENC_RINGS];
+ struct amdgpu_ring ring_jpeg;
struct amdgpu_irq_src irq;
struct drm_sched_entity entity_dec;
struct drm_sched_entity entity_enc;
+ struct drm_sched_entity entity_jpeg;
Why do you need the entity here? I thought the JPEG ring is stateles?
Right. We don't even need them for dec and enc. I think there is a
copy-over from legacy UVD/VCE stuff with handles limitation, for that we
need scheduler involved to send a destroy message.
I will come up a patch to remove those entities for dec and enc.
Regards,
Leo
Christian.
unsigned num_enc_rings;
};
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
