> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian König [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 2:39 PM
> To: Deucher, Alexander; 'Christian König'; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: don't use ttm_bo_move_ttm in
> amdgpu_ttm_bind
> 
> Am 26.10.2017 um 20:11 schrieb Deucher, Alexander:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: amd-gfx [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
> >> Of Christian König
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:06 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: don't use ttm_bo_move_ttm in
> >> amdgpu_ttm_bind
> >>
> >> From: Christian König <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Just unbind and rebind to force updates of the GART space.
> >>
> >> This prevents forcing the BO to be idle.
> > Is there a chance something could change like the caching on a  rebind that
> we need to account for?
> 
> Not that I could think of.
> 
> The new placement should have identical attributes to the old one, just
> with GART space allocated.

In that case,

Acked-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

> 
> Christian.
> 
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 24
> ++++++++++++++++++-
> >> -----
> >>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> >> index 3045701..b40d2f3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> >> @@ -917,14 +917,26 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_bind(struct ttm_buffer_object
> >> *bo, struct ttm_mem_reg *bo_mem)
> >>    if (unlikely(r))
> >>            return r;
> >>
> >> -  r = ttm_bo_move_ttm(bo, true, false, &tmp);
> >> -  if (unlikely(r))
> >> +  if (ttm->state == tt_bound) {
> >> +          r = ttm->func->unbind(ttm);
> >> +          if (unlikely(r))
> >> +                  return r;
> >> +
> >> +          ttm->state = tt_unbound;
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >> +  r = ttm_tt_bind(ttm, &tmp);
> >> +  if (unlikely(r)) {
> >>            ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, &tmp);
> >> -  else
> >> -          bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> >> -                  bo->bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> >> +          return r;
> >> +  }
> >>
> >> -  return r;
> >> +  ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, bo_mem);
> >> +  bo->mem = tmp;
> >> +  bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> >> +          bo->bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
> >> +
> >> +  return 0;
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   int amdgpu_ttm_recover_gart(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> amd-gfx mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> 

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to