Hi all,

Could someone review this patch? 

— 
Sincerely Yours,
Pixel







On 17/10/2017, 4:06 PM, "amd-gfx on behalf of Ding, Pixel" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

>you can see the difference of function amdgpu_need_post. Generally speaking, 
>there were 2 functions to check VBIOS posting, one considers VF and passthru 
>while the other doesn’t. In fact we should always consider VF and PT for 
>checking, right? For example, this checking here believe VF needs a posting 
>because SCRATCH registers are not the expected value. Is it clear?
>— 
>Sincerely Yours,
>Pixel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 17/10/2017, 5:00 PM, "Liu, Monk" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>From the patch itself I still couldn't tell the difference 
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ding, Pixel 
>>Sent: 2017年10月17日 15:54
>>To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Koenig, 
>>Christian <[email protected]>
>>Cc: Li, Bingley <[email protected]>; Sun, Gary <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: always consider virualised device for 
>>checking post
>>
>>It fixes a issue hidden in:
>>
>>95 static bool igp_read_bios_from_vram(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> 96 {
>> 97   uint8_t __iomem *bios;
>> 98   resource_size_t vram_base;
>> 99   resource_size_t size = 256 * 1024; /* ??? */
>>100
>>101   if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU))
>>102           if (amdgpu_need_post(adev))
>>103           return false;
>>
>>
>>This makes bios reading fallback to SMC INDEX/DATA register case.
>>
>>— 
>>Sincerely Yours,
>>Pixel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 17/10/2017, 3:48 PM, "Liu, Monk" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't understand how this patch works??? Looks like just rename 
>>>vpost_needed to check_post
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Pixel Ding [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>>Sent: 2017年10月17日 14:38
>>>To: [email protected]; Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; Koenig, 
>>>Christian <[email protected]>
>>>Cc: Li, Bingley <[email protected]>; Sun, Gary <[email protected]>; Ding, 
>>>Pixel <[email protected]>
>>>Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amdgpu: always consider virualised device for 
>>>checking post
>>>
>>>From: pding <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>The post checking on scratch registers isn't reliable for virtual function.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: pding <[email protected]>
>>>---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c 
>>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>index 683965b..ab8f0d6 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ void amdgpu_gart_location(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
>>>struct amdgpu_mc *mc)
>>>  * or post is needed if  hw reset is performed.
>>>  * Returns true if need or false if not.
>>>  */
>>>-bool amdgpu_need_post(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>+static bool amdgpu_check_post(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> {
>>>     uint32_t reg;
>>> 
>>>@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ bool amdgpu_need_post(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> 
>>> }
>>> 
>>>-static bool amdgpu_vpost_needed(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>+bool amdgpu_need_post(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>> {
>>>     if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
>>>             return false;
>>>@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static bool amdgpu_vpost_needed(struct amdgpu_device 
>>>*adev)
>>>                             return true;
>>>             }
>>>     }
>>>-    return amdgpu_need_post(adev);
>>>+    return amdgpu_check_post(adev);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> /**
>>>@@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>     amdgpu_device_detect_sriov_bios(adev);
>>> 
>>>     /* Post card if necessary */
>>>-    if (amdgpu_vpost_needed(adev)) {
>>>+    if (amdgpu_need_post(adev)) {
>>>             if (!adev->bios) {
>>>                     dev_err(adev->dev, "no vBIOS found\n");
>>>                     amdgpu_vf_error_put(AMDGIM_ERROR_VF_NO_VBIOS, 0, 0);
>>>--
>>>2.9.5
>>>
>_______________________________________________
>amd-gfx mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to