We should avoid functionality duplication here.
Either change the caller of amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion_ring()
to use amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion() or use
amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion_ring() in
amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion().
The later is probably easier to do.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 09.10.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Liu, Monk:
Why do that ?
In outside there is already a for loop to iterate over all rings so
force_completion_ring() is the right one to use
BR Monk
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian König [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2017年10月9日 16:24
To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] drm/amdgpu:explicitly call fence_process
Am 30.09.2017 um 08:03 schrieb Monk Liu:
this way no need to wait timer triggered to save time
In principle a good idea, but please remove
amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion_ring() and use
amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion() instead.
Regards,
Christian.
Change-Id: Ie96fd2fc1f6054ebc1e58c3d703471639371ee22
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
index 333bad7..13785d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
@@ -543,8 +543,13 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
void amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
{
- if (ring)
+ if (ring) {
amdgpu_fence_write(ring, ring->fence_drv.sync_seq);
+ /* call fence process manually can get it done quickly
+ * instead of waiting for the timer triggered
+ */
+ amdgpu_fence_process(ring);
+ }
}
/*
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
