>using this register to replace MM_HDP_DEBUG0 is suggested from a HDP HW guys

I'm OK with this line.

Thanks for explain.
David Zhou

On 2017年09月19日 15:00, Liu, Monk wrote:
First, I didn't check if windows did this way or not, because I don't sure if 
windows is always doing the right thing, e.g. for GFX preemption I didn't copy 
windows scheme and we found couple bugs in windows but not in linux ...
So please don't assume we should copy from windows, unless it's solid like a 
dead bone

Second, this register is originally comes from the definition file 
"hdp_4_0_offset.h", not recently introduced by me or someone else, and using 
this register to replace MM_HDP_DEBUG0 is suggested from a HDP HW guys when
I was working on the PAL/VULKAN preemption hang issue in Orlando, sorry I 
missed that guy's name ...

@Deucher, Alexander do you know who is on hdp hw ? we can confirm with him


If you're feeling bad about this change, I can add "if sriov" condition to all 
of it, so bare-metal will keep still,  is that okay ?

BR Monk


-----Original Message-----
From: Zhou, David(ChunMing)
Sent: 2017年9月19日 14:51
To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu:use formal register to trigger hdp 
invalidate


Seems the change is more proper, but where do you find 
mmHDP_READ_CACHE_INVALIDATE? Could you double check if Windows driver has 
changed to use this?
I'm confusing it, since mmHDP_DEBUG0 implementation is from windows as well.
I even don't find mmHDP_READ_CACHE_INVALIDATE in register spec.

Regards,
David Zhou
On 2017年09月19日 14:46, Liu, Monk wrote:
What question ? please reply here

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhou, David(ChunMing)
Sent: 2017年9月19日 12:25
To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu:use formal register to trigger
hdp invalidate

Please answer my question as I raised in another thread, otherwise I will give 
a NAK on this!

Regards,
David Zhou

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Liu, Monk
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:04 PM
To: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu:use formal register to trigger
hdp invalidate

Yeah, vnc1_0 and uvd_v7_0

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: 2017年9月18日 19:39
To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu:use formal register to trigger
hdp invalidate

Yeah, but Vega10 has UVD7 and in uvd_v7_0.c we have:

static void uvd_v7_0_ring_emit_hdp_invalidate(struct amdgpu_ring
*ring) {
          amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(SOC15_REG_OFFSET(HDP, 0,
mmHDP_DEBUG0), 0));
          amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 1);
}
That should probably be fixed as well.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 18.09.2017 um 13:03 schrieb Liu, Monk:
Only vega10 has this register

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian König [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2017年9月18日 17:20
To: Liu, Monk <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] drm/amdgpu:use formal register to trigger
hdp invalidate

Am 18.09.2017 um 08:11 schrieb Monk Liu:
Change-Id: I61dc02ea6a450f9acfa3bae07aa20244261f5369
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>

Please scan the code once more, we most likely have used mmHDP_DEBUG0 for this 
at even more places.

Christian.

---
     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c  | 2 +-
     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 2 +-
     2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index f201510..44960b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -3549,7 +3549,7 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_hdp_flush(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring)
     static void gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_hdp_invalidate(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
     {
        gfx_v9_0_write_data_to_reg(ring, 0, true,
-                                  SOC15_REG_OFFSET(HDP, 0, mmHDP_DEBUG0), 1);
+                                  SOC15_REG_OFFSET(HDP, 0, 
mmHDP_READ_CACHE_INVALIDATE), 1);
     }
static void gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_ib_gfx(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
index fd7c72a..d5f3848 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static void sdma_v4_0_ring_emit_hdp_invalidate(struct 
amdgpu_ring *ring)
     {
        amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SDMA_PKT_HEADER_OP(SDMA_OP_SRBM_WRITE) |
                          SDMA_PKT_SRBM_WRITE_HEADER_BYTE_EN(0xf));
-       amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(HDP, 0, mmHDP_DEBUG0));
+       amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(HDP, 0,
+mmHDP_READ_CACHE_INVALIDATE));
        amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 1);
     }
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to