[Public] > From: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 7:02 PM > To: Liang, Prike <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/amdgpu: set the evf name to identify the userq > case > > Am 16.04.25 um 10:50 schrieb Prike Liang: > > The evf fence name can clearly identify the userq usage. > > > > Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c > > index 7030d721196b..b34225bbd85d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c > > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > > static const char * > > amdgpu_eviction_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence) { > > - return "amdgpu"; > > + return "amdgpu_userq_evf"; > > Please use amdgpu_eviction as name here. > Apart from that looks good to me.
Thanks for the suggestion. I will update in the following later version. > > Regards, > Christian. > > > } > > > > static const char *
