From: Christian König <[email protected]>

This is quite controversial because it adds another lock which is held during
page table updates, but I don't see much other option.

v2: allow multiple updates to be in flight at the same time

Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> (v1)
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c
index 459f02e..333521e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mn.c
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ struct amdgpu_mn {
        /* objects protected by lock */
        struct rw_semaphore     lock;
        struct rb_root          objects;
+
+       /* protected by task_lock */
+       spinlock_t              task_lock;
+       DECLARE_HASHTABLE(task_hash, 7);
 };
 
 struct amdgpu_mn_node {
@@ -59,6 +63,12 @@ struct amdgpu_mn_node {
        struct list_head                bos;
 };
 
+struct amdgpu_mn_task {
+       struct hlist_node       node;
+       struct task_struct      *task;
+       unsigned                recursion;
+};
+
 /**
  * amdgpu_mn_destroy - destroy the rmn
  *
@@ -107,6 +117,75 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 }
 
 /**
+ * amdgpu_mn_read_lock - take the rmn read lock
+ *
+ * @rmn: our notifier
+ *
+ * Take the rmn read side lock.
+ */
+static void amdgpu_mn_read_lock(struct amdgpu_mn *rmn)
+{
+       struct amdgpu_mn_task *task;
+
+       spin_lock(&rmn->task_lock);
+       hash_for_each_possible(rmn->task_hash, task, node,
+                              (unsigned long)current) {
+               if (task->task != current)
+                       continue;
+
+               spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+               ++task->recursion;
+               return;
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+
+       task = kmalloc(sizeof(*task), GFP_KERNEL);
+       task->task = current;
+       task->recursion = 1;
+
+       down_read(&rmn->lock);
+
+       spin_lock(&rmn->task_lock);
+       hash_add(rmn->task_hash, &task->node, (unsigned long)current);
+       spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * amdgpu_mn_read_unlock - drop the rmn read lock
+ *
+ * @rmn: our notifier
+ *
+ * Drop the rmn read side lock.
+ */
+static void amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(struct amdgpu_mn *rmn)
+{
+       struct amdgpu_mn_task *task;
+
+       spin_lock(&rmn->task_lock);
+       hash_for_each_possible(rmn->task_hash, task, node,
+                              (unsigned long)current) {
+               if (task->task != current)
+                       continue;
+
+               spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+               if (--task->recursion) {
+                       return;
+               }
+
+               spin_lock(&rmn->task_lock);
+               hash_del(&task->node);
+               spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+               kfree(task);
+
+               up_read(&rmn->lock);
+               return;
+       }
+       spin_unlock(&rmn->task_lock);
+
+       BUG();
+}
+
+/**
  * amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node - unmap all BOs of a node
  *
  * @node: the node with the BOs to unmap
@@ -152,7 +231,7 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_page(struct mmu_notifier 
*mn,
        struct amdgpu_mn *rmn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
        struct interval_tree_node *it;
 
-       down_read(&rmn->lock);
+       amdgpu_mn_read_lock(rmn);
 
        it = interval_tree_iter_first(&rmn->objects, address, address);
        if (it) {
@@ -162,7 +241,7 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_page(struct mmu_notifier 
*mn,
                amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node(node, address, address);
        }
 
-       up_read(&rmn->lock);
+       amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(rmn);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -187,7 +266,7 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct 
mmu_notifier *mn,
        /* notification is exclusive, but interval is inclusive */
        end -= 1;
 
-       down_read(&rmn->lock);
+       amdgpu_mn_read_lock(rmn);
 
        it = interval_tree_iter_first(&rmn->objects, start, end);
        while (it) {
@@ -198,14 +277,33 @@ static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct 
mmu_notifier *mn,
 
                amdgpu_mn_invalidate_node(node, start, end);
        }
+}
+
+/**
+ * amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end - callback to notify about mm change
+ *
+ * @mn: our notifier
+ * @mn: the mm this callback is about
+ * @start: start of updated range
+ * @end: end of updated range
+ *
+ * Release the lock again to allow new command submissions.
+ */
+static void amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+                                          struct mm_struct *mm,
+                                          unsigned long start,
+                                          unsigned long end)
+{
+       struct amdgpu_mn *rmn = container_of(mn, struct amdgpu_mn, mn);
 
-       up_read(&rmn->lock);
+       amdgpu_mn_read_unlock(rmn);
 }
 
 static const struct mmu_notifier_ops amdgpu_mn_ops = {
        .release = amdgpu_mn_release,
        .invalidate_page = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_page,
        .invalidate_range_start = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_start,
+       .invalidate_range_end = amdgpu_mn_invalidate_range_end,
 };
 
 /**
@@ -242,6 +340,8 @@ struct amdgpu_mn *amdgpu_mn_get(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
        rmn->mn.ops = &amdgpu_mn_ops;
        init_rwsem(&rmn->lock);
        rmn->objects = RB_ROOT;
+       spin_lock_init(&rmn->task_lock);
+       hash_init(rmn->task_hash);
 
        r = __mmu_notifier_register(&rmn->mn, mm);
        if (r)
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to