On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> wrote: > Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> > > But isn't that a bug in the SPARC kernel headers? Shouldn't they handle > that dependency rather than putting the responsibility on unsuspecting > users of mmu_context.h? I sent a question about this to Pavel Tatashin > on Aug 22, but haven't heard back from him. > > Regards, > Felix > You are probably right, but I because I don't know how much the SPARC people are responsive, I thought that it wouldn't be that bad to fix it in our code. Oded
> > On 2017-09-04 04:54 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h >> index 8d689ab7e429..20bf9054e64e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ >> #define AMDGPU_AMDKFD_H_INCLUDED >> >> #include <linux/types.h> >> +#include <linux/percpu.h> >> #include <linux/mmu_context.h> >> #include <kgd_kfd_interface.h> >> > _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
