On 19. 08. 24, 22:12, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[Public]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 3:54 AM
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Deucher, Alexander
<[email protected]>; Sasha Levin <[email protected]>; Koenig,
Christian <[email protected]>; Pan, Xinhui <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 090/263] drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the param type of
set_power_profile_mode
FTR:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
Ma Jun ([email protected])
The email address you entered couldn't be found
So the author of the patch CANNOT respond. Anyone else?
This was a Coverity fix. As to why it was pulled into stable, I think Sasha's
scripts picked it up.
Sorry, but again, why do we change the kernel to _silence_ Coverity? We
do not do this even for compilers.
I am asking, why do you call this a fix at all? What does it fixes?
And finally, Coverity has a "False positive" selection box to dismiss a
warning for good. One needs not changing the code.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
