On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:00:42AM -0400, Tom St Denis wrote: > We correctly grabbed the bits but did not shift them > back to their correct place. > > Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Huang Rui <[email protected]> > --- > src/lib/ring_decode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/ring_decode.c b/src/lib/ring_decode.c > index 772ea49dda6f..c05fa632a233 100644 > --- a/src/lib/ring_decode.c > +++ b/src/lib/ring_decode.c > @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void print_decode_pm4_pkt3(struct umr_asic *asic, > struct umr_ring_decoder > case 0x33: // INDIRECT_BUFFER_CONST > switch (decoder->pm4.cur_word) { > case 0: printf("IB_BASE_LO: 0x%08lx, SWAP:%lu", > BITS(ib, 2, 32), BITS(ib, 0, 2)); > - decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_lo = > BITS(ib, 2, 32); > + decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_lo = > BITS(ib, 2, 32) << 2; > break; > case 1: printf("IB_BASE_HI: 0x%08lx", BITS(ib, > 0, 16)); > decoder->pm4.next_ib_state.ib_addr_hi = > BITS(ib, 0, 16); > -- > 2.12.0 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
