On 3/18/24 6:50 AM, Srinivasan Shanmugam wrote:
Adds descriptions for 'new_context', 'srf_updates', and 'surface_count',
and removes the excess description for 'context'.

Fixes the below with gcc W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:4411: warning: Function 
parameter or member 'new_context' not described in 
'commit_minimal_transition_state_in_dc_update'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:4411: warning: Function 
parameter or member 'srf_updates' not described in 
'commit_minimal_transition_state_in_dc_update'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:4411: warning: Function 
parameter or member 'surface_count' not described in 
'commit_minimal_transition_state_in_dc_update'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:4411: warning: Excess 
function parameter 'context' description in 
'commit_minimal_transition_state_in_dc_update'

Cc: Wenjing Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Alex Hung <[email protected]>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]>
Cc: Roman Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Chung <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
index 119eee2c97d4..08ca97bb4160 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
@@ -4391,8 +4391,10 @@ static bool 
commit_minimal_transition_based_on_current_context(struct dc *dc,
   * on current or new context
   *
   * @dc: DC structure, used to get the current state
- * @context: New context
+ * @new_context: New context
   * @stream: Stream getting the update for the flip
+ * @srf_updates: Surface updates
+ * @surface_count: Number of surfaces
   *
   * The function takes in current state and new state and determine a minimal
   * transition state as the intermediate step which could make the transition

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]>

Reply via email to