It should be possible to type a switch expression with void

[Remi Forax]

There is a bad interaction between a lambda and a switch expression,
a lambda allows its expression to be typed void but a switch expression can not 
be typed void,
so the following code does not compile 

  sealed interface I permits A, B {}
  record A() {}
  record B() {}
  
  public Optional<A> findOneA(List<I> list) {
    return list.stream()
      .<A>mapMulti((i, consumer) -> switch(i) {
          case A a -> consumer.accept(a);
          case B b -> {}
      })
      .findFirst();
  }

This bug occurs for with any methods that takes a Consumer has parameter (so 
stream.forEach/peek, Iterator.forEachRemaining etc).

The workaound is to add a pair of curly braces around the switch to transform 
it to a switch statement.

For me, it should be possible to have a switch expression typed void. This is a 
backward compatible change given that the code does not compile otherwise.

regards,
Rémi