On 9/24/19 8:38 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Sep 24, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Vicente Romero <[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/24/19 4:07 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
Question - should RecordComponent extend java.lang.reflect.Member (after all,
it has a name and a type). Not 100% sure.
good question, I would say yes, we can say that record components are members
of the class, but I'm not 100% sure either
Turning this crank once more, I’d say that the presence of isVarArgs and the
generic
string as queries is evidence that we are looking at this factoring:
(RecordComponent | Method | Constructor) <: Executable <: (AccessibleObject &
Member & GenericDeclaration)
at first glance, RecordComponent <: Executable doesn't feel right to me
even if there are common members
In this account, “Method getAccessor” would become either unnecessary, or a
low-level sideshow.
(Raising the question: Should the jlr.Method of an RC be synthetic, or should
the same API point
be reflected in two places?)
— John
Vicente
