Hi, >>>> For this reason I turned the order of the milters. First OpenDKIM, second >>>> Amavis. So now OpenDKIM sees mail and always treats them as "no spam". It >>>> stores information in a flat file, which in turn is inserted into a >>>> database on a cron job basis. To correct the mistake of "each mail is no >>>> spam", I must store spam mails in quarantine _and_ reject the mail. >>> >>> Hi Christian, let the apps do what they made vor , why care OpenDKIM >>> sees something than spam or not, it should do sign and verify dkim sigs, >>> that an option exist must not mean that it is a good idea to use it in >>> every setup >> >> I have sent you an offlist mail. >> >> This is part of OpenDKIM and I want to follow the idea of a DKIM reputation >> database, which exactly has been developed in OpenDKIM. > > yeah ,what i mean, somebody may adapt this features direct in the > amavis framework for better handling
Two reasons why I prefer OpenDKIM for DKIM stuff: think about a distributed environment. You may run milters not always on the same machine. And second I prefer OpenDKIM, as I can do the whole Key management in a LDAP database. -Christian Rößner -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Axel von der Ohe, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Joerg Heidrich
