Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2011, 08:38:20 schrieb Bart Cerneels: > I'm afraid folder in folder has not been possible since I radically > re-factored the playlists code to allow for fancy stuff such as > playlist synchronization and a common, efficient, architecture. > The basic concept is now that playlists have labels and these labels > are translated to folders, similar to how gmail does labeling. The > Merged View of the saved playlists category is just a way to represent > these labels as folders. Unfortunately, like gmail, we have the > problem that multi-level folders are difficult to represent using > labels, or at least the way our mapping from labels to folders is > implemented.
Hey Bart, sorry to hear that; I've also been waiting for multi level folder structures to appear again. I'd strongly vote for going that extra mile. One question, though: why should it be difficult to represent multi level folders by simple string labels? Any folder in my file system can be represented by a simple string: /foo/bar/xxx. Of course, in this scenario, renaming such a "folder" might require touching a lot more labels than only the ones of its direct content. But, as I stated already, I'd be very glad if someone could and would go and implement that. Just my 2 ct Andreas -- Wer Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie behalten. _______________________________________________ Amarok mailing list Amarok@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
