On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer <thomas.pfeif...@kde.org> wrote: > On 30.06.2016 13:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >> >> Forwarding where this belongs. Surprised you didn't know that, Thomas ... >> >> For the record: ama...@kde.org is the user support ML > > > Ah yes, right, sorry, I even once was on amarok-devel. > The reason why I sent to amarok is that I just went through the list on > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/ and for some reason, for Amarok there > is only Akademy-br, Amarok, Amarok-bugs-dist and Amarok-private, of which > amarok sounded like the most fitting one. > Maybe you should add amarok-devel there?
We decided against that years ago, because the devel list was flooded by support requests from users. All developers know the list, it can be found easily on our community wiki pages and we invite all new contributors to it automatically. So there is no real reason to disclose the list. The same is valid for the IRC channel, btw Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)
